Sue Me Later

Australian Lawyer Predicts Problems in the Ben Roberts-Smith Trial

Hayder Shkara

Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.

0:00 | 7:39

The case against Ben Roberts-Smith is shaping up to be one of the most difficult prosecutions Australia has ever attempted.

In this video, I break down the real problems with this case from the perspective of an Australian lawyer.

Once you strip away the media coverage - what you’re left with is a prosecution that faces serious legal and practical hurdles:

– Allegations coming out of a war zone, years after the fact
– Heavy reliance on witness evidence that will be aggressively challenged
– The overlap with a civil case that already made findings against him
– And the sheer complexity of trying to prove criminal guilt beyond reasonable doubt

This is where things get interesting

I also cover:
– why delay is such a big issue in cases like this
– how credibility battles can make or break a trial
– and the legal risks both sides are walking into

0:00 - Ben Roberts-Smith Charged with War Crimes
0:18 - An Extreme Prosecution Challenge
1:03 - Meet Hayder Shkara
1:31 - The Problem of Time
1:43 - Lack of Physical Evidence
1:55 - Fading Witness Testimonies
2:13 - Witness Logistics in Afghanistan
2:36 - Comparing Domestic vs. War Zone Forensics
3:34 - Witness Credibility & Reputation Pressure
4:20 - National Security vs. Public Interest
4:41 - Document Redaction & Immunity Claims
5:35 - Defamation Trial Context
6:10 - Pre-trial Media Prejudice
6:21 - The Risk of a Hung Jury
7:12 - Conclusion & Outro